Possible theories for crime: Nature versus Nurture.

Possible theories for crime Nature versus Nurture.Crime is a matter of popular interest and cogitate it is everywhere you look from newspapers to cinemas. Criminal acts bring on the ability to repel and fascinate us at the same clip. When violence occurs we want answers. One of the questions people ofttimes ask when hearing of a crime, whether it be burglary or murder, is why? What causes cruel behaviour? Unless we know what causes an act of violence it is hard to put it behind us.The attempt for the causes of crime continues to form the basis of some criminological studies. There argon numerous explanations for crime biological, economical, geographical, psychiatric, psychological, sociological. However, broadly speaking these causes gener every(prenominal)y f each(prenominal) into two prefatory schools of thought, nature and nurture, and while most of us allow embrace notions from both sides, rough criminologists tend to lean more in integrity direction than the separate . psychological theories of crime hold the view that individual varietys in behaviour may make some people more predisposed to cave inting guilty acts. These differences may go on from somebodyality characteristics, biological factors or social interactions.As there atomic number 18 so umteen theories for felonious behaviour this paper allow for focus on the biological and purlieual factors, which may account for the growing social problem of violent and antisocial conduct.It was an urge.a strong urge, and the longer I let it go the stronger it got, to where I was taking gambles to go turn up and kill people-risks that normally, according to my little rules of operation, I wouldnt take because they could conduce to arrest.Edmond Kemper (cited on http//www.crimelibrary.com)Where does this urge come from? Do we all possess it and if so, what stops some people from committing crimes, whether it be murder, as in this case, or something less, whilst former(a)s give the gaten ot control this urge. It could be said that criminals draw no control over their impulses, whereas we do no matter how angry we array there is something that stops us from taking this anger out on other people. harmonise to Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) all humans suck up natural drives and urges repressed in the unconscious. More importantly he as well claims that all humans have criminal tendencies. It is with the work at of socialisation that these tendencies are curbed by the development of inner controls that are short-changeed through childhood experiences (Eysenck, 1977). Maybe the thing that stops us is the thought of the penalisation we would receive if caught, or maybe it is morality or social programming. It may even be that we are afraid that if we commit a crime and are caught, we risk losing the social bonds that we have with other people, as they will then think less of us. Humans are knowledgeable people who understand a great deal close the conditions and co nsequences of what they do in every day life (Farrell, Bowling, 1999). Once convicted of a crime and in court, there is an make upd ferocity upon the free will and moral responsibility of the offender for their actions.However the conception of the offender being genetically at risk has now emerged. There have been numerous studies carried out on twins to determine whether genetic influences play a part in criminal behaviour. Christiansen (1977) reported on the criminality of a total population of 3,586 twin pairs from Denmark. He instal that 52% of the twins were harmonic for criminal behaviour for identical twin pairs, whilst 22% of the twins were concordant for fraternal twin pairs. These results suggest that identical twins carry some form of biological characteristic that increases their risk of becoming involved in criminal behaviour (McLaughlin, Muncie, Hughes, 2003).However, the thought that criminal behaviour is due to genetics poses many an(prenominal) questions. At a personal train, people wonder about how much genuine choice they have over their lives. Accepting genetic causes for their traits squeeze out relieve guilt about behaviour they want to change, but cannot.According to Gibbons (1968), the genetic opening indicates that inherited traits are special in nature, i.e. so that a person inherits green eyes and blonde hair. However criminal behaviour is not specific, it covers a wide range of criminal activities from petty theft to mass murder. Also, many criminals engage in a range of these activities, not unendingly one specific type of crime, therefore how can the genetic possible action account for this variability? It could be suggested that criminals inherit general tendencies to commit laws. However criminals do not break all laws, they obey to most. It is very difficult to demonstrate any feasible mechanism for the inheritance of criminality (Eysenck, 1977). A disorder such as cystic Fibrosis is a disorder produced entirely b y hereditary causes. The cause is kn give and understood and the presence of the disorder can be determined with accuracy. With this in mind, what sorting of structure can be imagined to underlie the cause of crime?What is criminal in one country may not be criminal in another country the purchasing of marijuana is legal in Amsterdam whilst illegal in many other countries.Also, what is a crime at one time may not be a crime at another time, i.e. it is a citizens duty to kill in war but outdoors of war it is a crime. People are able to understand the differences in situations like these. What some people do find difficult is the thought that a gene or chromosome may cause the difference between a criminal and a non-criminal (Eysenck, 1977).In a regard carried out by Bernhardt (1930) on two groups of siblings, group one had both parents as none criminal, but criminality was among the grandparents or other close relatives, and the second group had no criminal parents or other relati ons. He found twice as tall a crime rate among siblings in group one, than in group two, and postulated that this difference must(prenominal)iness be endogenously cause, as both groups of children grew up in non criminal homes. As can be seen from this study, it is difficult to eliminate environmental factors. There is al demeanors the possibility of direct influence from grandparent to grandchild. It may also be assumed that grandchildren of criminal grandparents are exposed to less favourable environmental influences via the intermediate enate link. Plus, the probability that the environment the parents create for their children is much the same as the grandparents created for the parents, is very likely.The biological side of criminal behaviour can be studied through mental patients. In a ten year follow up of criminality in Stockholm mental patients, Belfrage (1998) found new evidence for a consanguinity between mental disorder and crime. The study was carried out on 1056 m ental patients with the diagnosis of schizophrenia, modifyive psychosis or paranoia. After they had been discharged from mental hospitals in 1986, they were followed up ten age later. It was found that of those who were forty years old or younger at the time of discharge, nearly 40% had a criminal record, compared to less than 10% of the general public. According to Soothill, Peelo and Taylor (2002), on a typical day, four mentally disordered offenders are admitted from the courts to Broadmoor hospital, Rampton hospital or Ashworth hospital on hospital orders. Also, about one offender a day is transferred after sentence from a prison service establishment to a hospital.However some criminologists regard biological evidence with alarm. Nelkin and Lindee (1995) believe that genetics, in relation to crime, deflects attention from the need for social reform, education and rehabilitation in tackling the violence in society. The study carried out by Komiya (1999) highlights the importan ce of environmental factors, such as families, schools and companies, concerned with the individual. This study was concerned with looking at the low crime rate in Japan in relation to the cultural background. It found that reasons for low crime rate were due to factors such as low unemployment, high educational standards, fixed justice in relation to the control of firearms and drugs and the certainty of arrest, self-discipline and the high level of self-control. This latter is regarded as the strongest weapon for survival in Japan and they learn the value of self-control at a very early stage in life. It is the most important stage of socialization in Japan, whereas in westerly countries a self of soul is most important. The socialization in Japan happens through/in families, schools and companies. In the family, children are under strict discipline. They learn to require parental authority therefore they are driven by parental expectations. There is lots of body contact i.e. bathing with parents. This is the opposite of Western families who progress their children to have their own bedroom. In the school there are lots of regulations and children also have peers. The companies provide security i.e. lifetime employment, medical support, retirements benefits. For this, Nipponese workers must accept strong informal social control by their company.As can be seen through this study Japan has a strong feel of security and an infinite number of repressive rules. These two factors act together to produce high levels of self-control, which acts as a strong force restraining people from committing crimes. The Japanese legal culture contributes to the prevention of crime by controlling the individuals behaviour. This is the opposite to the Western worlds emphasis on the permissive nature of rules and the relative freedom of action. According to Komiya (1999) this suggests there is a trade off between low crime rates and a strong awareness of freedom. If indivi duals have a strong sense of responsibility, a society can lower its crime rate without undermining freedom.It could be said that a persons environment depends to a certain extent on his/her own choice (Horwitz, Christiansen, 1983). It could also be that some individuals within certain areas are drawn into crime (McGuire, Mason, OKane, 2000). A case in which the latter may retain is institutional upbringing. There seems to be a stigma attached to children raised in an institute they are labelled as social deviants. However it must be remembered that children placed in these institutes, before being removed to the institute, are already in a rather threatened situation. Therefore it should be pass judgment that these children would show increased delinquency rates. However once a person is stigmatised by a label, the response is often to fulfil the label given and commit further acts of deviance.To take a inverted comma from http//www.crimelibrary.com,I have several children who Im turning into killers. Wait till they grow up.David BerkowitzThis illustrates how much of an impact the environment in which a child grows up in has later on in life. Reading this quote would definitely worry criminologists who believe that the environment shapes a person and influences later life choices. Some parents believe that by being harsh on a child will toughen the child up. Instead, it often creates a lack of love between parent and child that can have disastrous effects later on in life. If a child does not bond with his/her carers there is no foundation for trusting others later in life (http//www.crimelibrary.com). Bowlby (1957) carried out a study on 44 thieves at a psychiatric clinic. He believed that a long separation from the mother during the first five years of a childs life is a leading cause in the development of socially incapable, troublesome and delinquent personalities. Other studies claimed that the absence seizure of the father might also create an equally dangerous risk (Horwitz, Christiansen, 1983). Andry (1955) found that the absence of the father was as equal a risk as the absence of the mother, and re-established the father as an equally important figure (Horwitz, Christiansen, 1983). Either way, both lookers found that parents are very important in the development of children.A criminal can often be heard blaming his/her actions on a number of handed-down explanations childhood abuse, genetics, exposure to traumatic events and perceived social injustices to name a few. However the problem with this is that many people have been exposed to one or more of these traumas, yet they do not turn to crime. Maybe it is an interaction of a number of factors. Yet in the case of Jeffrey Dahmer, who had an apparently normal upbringing, environment does not seem able to explain the behaviour displayed. If there is a genetic explanation, it is difficult to explain, as we do not see entire families of, in this case, serial killers.Another a spect of crime, which is of interest, is understanding how and why offenders stop committing offences. This is crucial for the development of effective crime prevention and criminal justice practises. Without a theory as to why people stop offending it is difficult to know which policies and practises are best needed to stop it. Some criminologists believe that by trenchant for the causes of criminality, the attention is taken forward from the pressing task of crime management (McLaughlin, Muncie, Hughes, 2003).This essay has only just begun to skim over the causes of criminal behaviour. As can be seen it would be difficult to credit one theory for the explanation of crime, there is a continual interaction between both genetic an environmental factors they are functionally interdependent. No one study carried out can be said to provide conclusive evidence for either genetic factors or environmental factors (Horwitz, Christiansen, 1983). However if genetics were to be seen as the c ause of criminality, this would pose upcoming problems it may lead to genetic screening for the interest of risk assessment. This could lead to genetic discrimination, which could then lead to loss of employment or denial of insurance or other benefits (Rose, 2000). If crime were due to genes, the individual would not be to blame yet they would be punished through the mentioned ways.There must be something in the child himself which the environment brings out in the form of delinquency.This quote by Aichorn (Gibbons, 1968) demonstrates the importance of both nature and nurture acting together. Certain aspects of each theory help us to understand the criminals behaviour, and it is through this interaction that we are able to further our knowledge on criminology.Awareness of Students in put away Food usance ProposalAwareness of Students in Junk Food Consumption ProposalIzyan Hanim Binti IbrahimTHE AWARENESS OF STUDENTS IN PUSAT PERMATA PINTAR NEGARA IN CONSUMING JUNK FOODCHAPTER 1INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTIONWorld Health Organisation has verbalize that the statistical distribution of disease mainly is caused by the unhealthy eating lifestyle (As cited in CSE 2012). However, the adolescence really love eating toss away fodders including burgers, carbonated drinks, instant noodles, French fries, hotdogs, sweets, murphy chips and biscuits (Arya Mishra 2013). According to Arya Mishra (2013), they have classified adolescence stage into tierce stages which early adolescence, ranging from 11-14 years old, middle adolescence, teenagers of age 15-17 years old and lastly late adolescence that have ages of 18-21 years old. Those stages are the most important stages in human life cycle because during early adolescence is the emotional management stage due to it is a puberty level. Moreover, in the middle adolescence is the try-and-error stage because teenagers tend to try many new things and experiences and last but not least teenagers will figure out his or her fut ure plan during the late adolescence stage. The study has stated that wrong consumption of nutritives at this level will result a prolong impacts to them.Students of Pusat Permata Pintar Negara are the gifted students and their specialties should be preserved. This study will survey the awareness level of them in taking in the throw out intellectual nourishments to make them realise how dangerous is the action. Students who live far away or without parents have higher(prenominal) tendency to consume or buy junk pabulums. A study has discovered that sustenances full-bodied in nutrient have higher price index in trade fields compared to the unhealthy foods like junk foods ( Deakin University 2008).Finally, this research project will reveals the frequency of those students in devour junk foods from schooling session until living in the dorms session with others. Despite all ofthis, the tec will investigate how the examination year will demand the frequency of their consumptio n towards junk food in order to enhance the cognitive level.BACKGROUNDJunk foods are categorised as any types of meals that can be prepared in short time and does not require much energy to make it (Johnson et al. 2012). However, Escalante et al. (2004) has stated about the intake of beneficial nutrient decrease as the consumption of junk food increase in childrens meal. This is one of the tax deduction the over exposed children to the junk food advert continuously in front of television. For instances, the advertizing that make a non-stop promotion is Koko Krunch, Coca Cola, Pepsi Co and biscuits. Yosifon(2006) also support this claim about the effect of advertisement in monopoly the young generations mind. In addition, World Health Organisation (WHO) has come out with a result those actions is one factor that contributes to the increase of statistical analysis on the Body Mass Index (BMI). Company of junk food will target the new generation as their marketing customers to exploi t the profit (Yosifon 2006).Junk food is rich with salt, trans fat, sugar and many chemical contents as their preservative and addictive agent. Monosodium glutamate is the most well-known food addictive agent in junk food. Monosodium glutamate is one of a dangerous chemical that always being related with the development of cancer cell. As has been stated before, junk food is a food rich with fat. The consumption of high fat meals will make the signal of passion-supress is being ignored and leads to increase of appetite and gaining weight (Johnson et al. 2012).Not to be forgotten, Johnson et al. (2012) also have made a study on the effect of junk food on brain. The study has turn out that junk food can reduce the volume of brain. The reduction of brain capacity will lead to the neuro diseases. For students, the ability to memorise is important for the process of cognitive. So, the risk to be effected with Alzheimers disease should be lower by taking care of intake of junk food and aware with the intake of nutrients.2As conclusion, this research mainly wants to study the awareness of gifted students in the consumption of junk food and to determine whether examination year will rival the consumption of junk food in their diets.PROBLEM STATEMENTTeenagers are the main target for any company of junk food to be their customers. So, junk food has becomes one of their favourite food. Besides, the problem that has been observed by the society about this issue is the source to get this junk food can slowly bought by the students and there is no restriction. For examples, many types of junk food can be bought from the hawk machines, school canteens and the nearby grocery shop (Datar Nicosia 2009).As students they should go along the money wisely. So, they eat junk food because it is affordable and cheap. However, obesity cases among the young generation is rising up and continuously year by year (Escalante et al. 2004). conclusion OF searchThe purpose of conductin g this research is to study the awareness level among students of Pusat Permata Pintar Negara in consuming junk food in their diets. Junk food contains many types of chemicals and the most well-known chemicals lay in that food is monosodium glutamate. Monosodium glutamate can produce an addictive flavour that enhances the taste of the foods (Husarova Ostatnikova 2013). As students, the frequency of taking junk food will be investigated by the police detective and to determine whether the examination year for nisus 5 student, that will facing Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia, will control them from taking the junk food. search OBJECTIVESTo determine whether students of Pusat Permata Pintar Negara aware about the intake of junk food.To study the frequency of students consuming junk food.3To investigate whether the examination year will furbish up their intake of junk food.RESEARCH QUESTIONSThe research questions areDoes the students of Pusat Permata Pintar Negara aware about the intake o f junk food?How frequent is the students consume junk food in their life routine?Does the examination season will affect the intake of junk food among the students of Pusat Permata Pintar Negara?RESEARCH HYPOTHESISAlternative hypothesis, The examination will affect the frequency of consuming junk food by the students.Null hypothesis, The examination will not affect the frequency of consuming junk food by the students.SIGNIFICANCE OF RESEARCHThis research is mainly done because teenagers nowadays are known as junk food generation because there are many of them that take in junk food as their main dishes every day. So, this research is one of a step towards reducing the intake of junk food especially among the students.The significance of this research is to enlighten the society about the dangerousness of junk food in harming the health. Besides, this research will highlight the seriousness4level of consuming the junk food in diets of students.LIMITATIONSThe samples of this rese arch are just from a small population of Pusat Permata Pintar Negara which have a total number of students of. repayable to small population, the sample used for this experiment will be a small sample size. The small sample size may not have a statistical support due to insignificant result of the finding for this research project.DEFINITION OF TERMSThe definition of each main concept in the research is as followsAWARENESSThe awareness of students in Pusat Permata Pintar Negara in this research is about how they control the intake of junk food even they know its significance on health. Moreover, it becomes serious when students tend to chewing something during study or revise in the night.FREQUENCYThe frequency of eating the junk food gives an idea to the readers about the number of consumption of junk food per day or per week.COGNITIVEThe ability of students to understand their studiesCONCLUSIONThe awareness of students in Pusat Permata Pintar Negara should be investigated throug h this research since they are the gifted students that need to preserve their specialities. Through this survey, maybe next research can study how to raise their awareness and decrease the consumption of junk food.5CHAPTER 2LITERATURE REVIEW2.1 INTRODUCTIONJunk food is defined as any food that contains less in nutrients but rich in the inappropriate things such as the preservative and the additive agents. Junk food can contribute to obesity and encourages the eaters to skip their breakfast because of improper meals time (Gopal et al. 2012). The study by Gopal et al. (2012) has claimed about the bad effect of consuming junk food that the society does not realise is about the decreasing absorption of atomic number 20 in humans. found on the survey by Gopal et al. (2012), their outcome of survey has shown that the biggest factor for the students to consume junk food probably is because of the taste of junk food itself. Almost 70% of the eaters agree with this factor and unfortunatel y almost half of them never care about the long-term effects.2.2 CHEMICALS IN JUNK FOODchemical substance in junk food has a high glycaemic index and will suppress the appetite of the eaters. In addition, chemicals in junk food can higher the level of sugar more rapidly compared to other type of food (Vartanian et al. 2007). Monosodium glutamate, MSG, is a well-known chemical agents used in junk food and many studies has been conducted by using the animals as the samples to prove its effect on health. The usual experiment was conducted to study the implication on procreative organs, central nervous form and adipose tissue (Husarova Ostatnikova, 2013). Overconsumption of junk food can reduce the size of lumen within age 30 and has a high risk to be attack by the coronary disease (Johnson et al. 2012).62.3 METABOLIC SYNDROMEMetabolic syndrome is defined as any disease that can lead to heart attack. For examples, high blood pressure, obesity, diabetes and obesity (Alberti et al. 2006 ). Husarova Ostatnikova (2013) has stated that chemical contents used in junk food can interrupt the metabolism process in humans body. Junk food can increase the parameters of insulin, fatty acid and triglycerides in serum (Husarova Ostatnikova 2013). They has been added that monosodium glutamate can increase the production of bile and the most dangerous element regarding this food addictive is it can change the structure of ovaries and fallopian tube. Besides, MSG can cause headache but the studied show there is no relationship between asthma and the uptake of junk food. Not only that, medical staff at Harvard University and University of Murcia can make the young men to distorted their reproductive system and development because the sperm produced will be the unhealthy sperm to fertilize with the ovum( Johnson et al. 2012).2.4 PREVIOUS RESEARCHA study has proved that junk foods nutritional content is approximately has zero content of nutrition. Furthermore, it has a large quant ity of trans fat. Trans fat acts like the saturated fat which contributes to the increase in the statistics of obesity (Johnson et al. 2012). A statistical by World Health Organisation (WHO) shows that 2.8 million of humans were killed yearly due to the problems of body weight or obesity. This implication of junk food has been supported by British Heart Foundation (2014) that excess consumption of junk food will higher the risk of obesity. As the obesity has stated in an individual life, he or she will has a higher tendency to be infected by mane other diseases. The most common disease is the coronary disease. Not to be forgotten, illness that related to the obesity is high blood pressure, diabetes type II and development of cancerous cell.A recent article by Gutierrez (2014) states that junk food makes the eaters become addictive to it and the addictive level is like craving for heroin. In addition, the article also has claimed about the effect of over consumption of junk food will make the person will7refuse to the healthy meals and they prefer to thirst themselves.When chemical content from junk food was entered the human body system, the biological content of brain will be deteriorated (Michelle 2014). It has been added that the entire body system will be interrupted especially the digestive system due to inappropriate digestive flow. A report by the Military Leaders for Kids (2010) has come out with a statement by the army that want all sources of junk food to be eliminated in school compounds either in canteens or vending machines. However, as a started step in order to remove the sources, conspiration between American Heart Association and the beverages companies was setting up to decrease 88% of the calories present in their product that will be in the school compound in United States.2.4 CONCLUSIONConsuming excess salt, sugar and many other unbeneficial needs to be controlled at the early age because obesity in young age will has a high probability t o develop into bragging(a) obese (British Heart Foundation 2014). The awareness level of students in Pusat Permata Pintar Negara in consuming junk food should be studied so that next research can be conducted to find the appropriate ways in increasing their awareness. Students of Pusat Permata Pintar Negara are the gifted students that need to be preserved their intellectual level.8CHAPTER 3RESEARCH METHODOLOGY3.1 RESEARCH DESIGNSurvey research method will be the research design for this study. 162 copies of questionnaires will be distributed among the students of Pusat Permata Pintar Negara, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. The samples will be divided into three groups which is Form 4, Form 5 and Asasi Pintar students. Those groups have 54 samples each and a total of 162 students will be involved. There are three different levels of students because the researcher want to know whether the examination year will affect the consumption of junk food which is Form 4 students are not in examination year, Form 5 students are in examination year (Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia) and Asasi Pintar students are in the post-examination year. The questionnaire that will be distributed is from the Codman Academy.3.2 RESEARCH PROCEDUREBased on Krejcie and Morgan table, the researcher can decide an appropriate number of samples. With the total number of population which is 280 students, Krejcie and Morgan table shows that the number of samples that should answer the Codman Academy questionnaire that will be distributed is at least 162 students. The result of the survey will have a valid result for the researcher to analyse.The questionnaire that will be distributed is taken from Codman Academy Junk Questionnaire Survey which already has its own validity. Therefore, pilot test is not necessary in this study . The questionnaire will be distributed among students of Pusat Permata Pintar Negara, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. There are 15 questions involving questions on frequency of consumption of junk food by students of Pusat Permata Pintar Negara. The duration for collecting the questionnaires with the answers will be about 5 days.9The questionnaire will be analysed and the researcher will study on the frequency of consumption of junk food. In addition, the frequency of the Form 5 students for the intake of junk food will be compared with respondents from Form 4 and ASASIpintar students because the researcher wants to investigate about the effect of examination year on the frequency of taking junk food.3.3 SAMPLE AND POPULATION3.3.1 RESEARCH POPULATIONThe population for this research is the students of Pusat Permata Pintar Negara, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia that will answer the questionnaire. The total number for the population is 280 students including Form 4, Form 5 and Asasi Pintar students.3.3.2 INCLUSION CRITERIA FOR THE STUDY SAMPLEThe samples should be studying in Form 4 and Form 5 because they already pass the maturation stage in thinking skill. So, the answer can be more relevant and it is more valid to analyse it as the research result.3.3.3 EXCLUSION CRITERIA FOR THE STUDY SAMPLEStudents which are in Foundation phase or in Form 1 level cannot be selected to answer the questionnaire because some of them have matured but some of the students still have the immature way of thinking. So, the answer will be the irrelevant answers.The lecturers or teachers are excluded from the sample because the researcher want to study the awareness in the consumption of junk food among the students due to they are known as the junk food generation.103.3.4 STRATIFIED SAMPLING METHODThe population will be grouped establish on the age and the level of studying in school either the students are from Form 4 (16 years old), Form 5 (17 years old) or the post Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia candidates which are in ASASIpintar (18 years old). The sampling method will be conducted from each of the age of students ages.3.4 INSTRUMENT3.4.1 KREJCIE AND MORGAN TABLEThis table gives the researcher a guideline in choosing the number of respondents needed for a certain number of population. The study will be conducted in Pusat Permata Pintar Negara which has a total number of 280 students including Form 4, Form 5 and Asasi Pintar students. So, a valid number of samples needed are 162 students.3.4.2 CODMAN ACADEMY JUNK FOOD QUESTIONNAIRECodman Academy Junk Food Questionnaire is taken as the questionnaire for this survey. The language used for this questionnaire is English language because it is a universal language. So, the respondents can answer the questionnaire without any obstacle due to language.3.5 DATA ANALYSISThe result from the questionnaire will be analysed by using the statistics software known as SPSS. Results will be presented through frequency counts and other descriptive statistics. From the analysis, the researcher can get the statistical analysis on the result of the awareness of students in Pusat Permata Pintar Negara toward s the intake of junk food. The hypothesis testing will be done by the researcher to make a decision. The decision is either to reject the null hypothesis or fail to reject null hypothesis. Microsoft Excel 2010 will be used to tabulate the data.113.6 PRELIMINARY BUDJET12REFERENCESBritish Heart Foundation. 2014. Briefing Junk food marketing to children campaignHusarova, V. Ostatnikova, D. 2013. JMED Research. Monosodium Glutamate ToxicEffects and Their Implications for Human economic consumption A Review 2013(2013)1-11Vartanian, L.R., Schwartz, M.B. Brownell, K.D. 2007. American Journal of PublicHealth. Framing Health Matters 97(4)667-675